Russians Don't Leave

MOST RUSSIANS DON"T WANT TO EMIGRATE

By Stephen Wilson

 

MOSCOW -- The overwhelming vast number of Russians don't want to leave Russia for

good. Or at least that is the conclusion of a recent poll undertaken by the

All Russian Center for Studying Russian Opinion which found that 89 % of

Russians would rather remain in their own country. While 10 % of those

polled would like to live abroad, 43 % of them are uncertain whether or

when this would be possible. This survey appears to represent the highest

percentage of those polled found in favor of remaining permanently in

Russia.

The survey also indicated how the motives of those seeking to go abroad

has changed over the last few years. While a survey two years revealed that

more than half of those wanting to leave were motivated by the dream of

a higher standard of living, better pay and benefit, this has declined to 33% !

More respondents appear to be citing ecological reasons as a prime source

for wishing to leave [ 4% in 2016 , 12% in 2017] and Human rights { 0% in

2016 , 10 % in 2017} Most of those who want to emigrate tend to be young

and from cities such as Moscow and Saint Petersburg. The favorite destination

appears to be Germany.

What are we to make of those findings ? I personally welcome them but don't

find it too consoling because my personal experience does not always tally

with this survey. For whatever reason, I keep encountering people wanting to

get out. Moscow is even beginning to remind me of poor Moldova. It is

unpleasant to stay in a country when you keep meeting people who tell you

" I hate this country and want to get out " Or as an accountant in an American company

SAS , told me : " If every employee had a chance , they would live abroad." This

turned out to be an overstatement as some employees told me they did not have

such a dream. In Moldova I was constantly asked for advice on how to obtain

citizenship in Britain. Now when I told those people I was happy to stay in Moldova

or Moscow rather than Scotland, they thought I was mad . It was disconcerting.

When I asked how they imagined life in Britain I found a highly unrealistic view

of Britain which did not echo any of my experiences in Scotland. They spoke of

highly paid jobs, a fair legal system and great medical care system. Where did

they get those high expectations ? Did it spring out of their imagination or word

of mouth ? A Russian artist from Moscow once bumped into me on the streets

and asked me : "Don't you get sick and tired of living in this country ? I'm surprised

you are still here ." She has visited and worked in New York and dreams of

permanent American citizenship which appears elusive. And how did she find

America? She adored New York ! She told me she found the people friendly, nice

and helpful. This is why I 'd never make rash judgments on a person's dream. Who

am I to break a person's illusions ?

I came across person, a student called Olga who could not get used to living in America.

She told me : "I went to live in America with my husband, who was a scientist. Although

he loved it I could not stay and missed Russia. I longed for my family so we split up.

I returned to Russia. .... What I found strange about America is that whenever I went for

a walk some driver would pull up and offer me help. They thought my car had broken down

or I needed a lift. But I only wanted to go for a walk. Americans seem to like driving

everywhere."

The worst attitude you can come across is people who think that to leave your country

is to abandon it and betray it. This attitude not only exists in Russia but Scotland. It is

summed up by the self righteous attitude of a poem : 'I never abandoned my country'

suggesting those who did were deserters of an army. This is not the best of Akhmatova's

poems.

Whatever we can conclude about the findings of this survey , it at least explodes the crude

myth that most Russians are dying to leave Russia , or that they find dwelling in their country unbearable. Whether they have lowered their expectations about life abroad in terms of becoming disillusioned remains an open question. They might well be heeding the old Russian proverb : 'Life is better where you don't live'. It is one thing to enjoy a holiday in Greece, quite another to live there ! They don't always take this proverb to heart in Scotland. When I last visited Scotland , many Scots I met asked how they could come to Russia to live. "It must be better than Scotland " they told me . The last person to phone me up and asked if she could come to stay permanently in Russia was my sister. I wonder what the Russians would make of this?

Pay differences

Huge pay differences at Russian universities

By Stephen Wilson

 

MOSCOW -- When Maria Koroleva, a Russian academic once attempted to persuade graduates from Moscow State University to pursue a doctorate she was met with a bemused stare which seemed to say : "And how would I feed myself never mind pay high

fees?" Undertaking a post graduate course without adequate state support seems

like a futile feat even for the most-talented students. Even if the course is completed,

jobs as academics still remain largely low paid not to mention entailing a bigger workload

due to increasing red tape. As in the West, attaining an academic career appears to

be a distant dream, or rather nightmare, depending how you look at things ! This is because

the long sought for dream of working as an academic can turn into a stressful headache.

You are no longer an academic but administrator in a hostile environment fraught with

petty office politics.

When Putin gave a long public question and answer forum to journalists and the people

he received many complaints about under or low pay . He acknowledged that violations

in pay had taken place and that the teachers in question should send a letter of complaint

to wage inspectors and other officials. But the scale of the complaints encompassing either

delayed salaries or blatant underpayment indicates the state's promise to increase by

100- 200% the salaries of teachers and doctors from 2012 has a long way to go. This

is because of widespread corruption within schools and universities as well as the absence

of an effective mechanism to take effective legal action against the culprits.

Only yesterday I was informed of how head teachers and administrative staff asked one

school teacher to open an account which would allow them to make illicit transfers which

concealed the level of payments allowing some head teachers to unfairly receive more

income than other teachers who would obtain far less.

Corruption concerning unfair pay is not new. One of the demands of the Bolsheviks was that the salary of an elected official should not be higher than the average salary of a skilled worker. Lenin was startled to discover that someone had raised his salary without his permission and that when he protested about it no action was taken ! Later on the salary of an official was not allowed to exceed two or three times the wage of a worker. In current times, the salary of a university lecturer should not exceed five times the amount of a university teacher. Alas, it blatantly does ! A rector's salary amounts to twenty times the salary of a university teacher at a time when universities are short of staff. Even a shortage of staff can be a blessing for some head teachers who take over the hours of two or three redundant teachers, make the minimum effort and attain a huge windfall.

The huge discrepancy of pay between rectors and teachers partly explains why the latter are so low paid ! For instance , Vladimir Litvinenko the Rector of Saint Petersburg Gorni University obtains a lavish annual salary of 195.7 million rubles and Anton Torkunov, rector of Moscow State Institute of International Relations receives an annual salary of 31.9 million rubles.

Compare this with the salary of a teacher at Institutes of Further Education who receives 55,000 rubles a year { ROSSTATA 2016} In many cases in the provinces, the salary of a rector can be 40 times the pittance of a teacher.You could fund whole faculties with the income a rector receives!

In many cases those rectors are so smug they don't even conceal their salaries ! On the

contrary they boast about them and show off their wealth. When they hear that some

wealthy managers in the West modestly conceal their wealth , go to work by tram and wear

informal clothes they are shocked by this. They think that flaunting their wealth boosts their

image rather than provokes people. Most of those rectors view an institute as a lucrative

business where they can rent out offices of the universities and pocket the money.

 

Irina Kantorovich states, "The reason for impoverished teachers was the new system of

paid labor introduced in 2008." She states that this system allows the management of such

institutes to decide which teacher should be paid the most and who should take the lion's share of the pay and increments. She has gathered a petition of 50,000 signatures calling for a much more accountable and decent pay system where payment is based on fair play and not caprice.

She has a hard job ahead of her! The government , rather than taking the bull by the horns

simply tells frustrated teachers to send a complaint to either an official in the Department of

Education or a wage inspector! Meanwhile rectors continue to draw staggering salaries as if

there were no tomorrow!

Sarah Chambers Fight Continues

The Fight to Save Our Top Activist Sarah Chambers Continues!
By Jim Vail

Many aldermen support star teacher activist Sarah Chambers.

The fight to save Saucedo special education teacher Sarah Chambers job continues as almost 20 aldermen have signed letters of support to have her reinstated.

Chambers, considered the Chicago Teachers Union top activist, was suspended and has a hearing to determine termination. The Chicago Public Schools have not determined exactly what she is accused of. Chambers says it is because she has been actively fighting against the board's special education cuts and other anti-public education policies.

Here is the letter of support from our Ald. Harry Osterman of the 48th Ward:

Ald. Harry Osterman wrote a letter in support of Sarah Chambers

"Dear Members of the Chicago Board of Education:

"Please allow this letter to serve as a formal request to have Sarah Chambers, an accomplished special education teacher and ardent advocate for expanding the rights and resources aimed at assisting students with special needs all throughout the Chicago Public School district, fully reinstated as a teacher in good standing.

"In addition to her extraordinary work in the classroom, Sarah is also a sponsor of the Gay-Straight Allianace (GSA) at Maria Saucedo Scholastic Academy, an important group aimed at fostering dialogue between student and faculty members at a time when the rights of LGBTQ students are under assault.

"Taken together, Sarah is an award winning teacher, one who has been praised for her efforts by six different administrations.

"There is much uncertainty surrounding the actual reasons why Sarah Chambers was suspended in the first place, particularly in light of the fact that special education funding is suffering from devastating cuts on the local, state and federal level, it hardly makes sense to lose our most talented instructors in this field in light of these circumstances.

"With so many hurdles facing our schools in the City of Chicago, I would hope that the Board of Education considers the unintended consequences of punished employees who dedicate their lives to advancing the cause of public education.

"I thank you in advance for your attention to the matter and please do not hesitate to contact my office if you have any questions reiterated in the request."

Sincerely,

Harry Osterman
Alderman, 48th Ward

Day of Protest

PROTEST AGAINST GOVERNMENT 

DAY OF CONFUSION

By Stephen Wilson

 

"What day was it ? " and "Where do we meet ?" were the questions which sprung to

mind when I woke up this on the 12th June. A further question which should have been

asked at a deeper level is not so much 'Who is to blame ?" and "What is to be done?"

but "What are the exact aims of this protest ?" I was not alone in this confusion . A

rally against corruption had been called on the 12th of June because it coincided

against on the celebration of 'The Day of Russia'. "They can't arrest people on this

day because there is no contradiction between gathering in the city to celebrate on

this day and a protest against corruption. "it was presumed. Besides, when Navalny,

announced the place of the demonstration had been abruptly changed from the officially

approved Prospect Sakhalova to Tverskaya square and that : "Your rights are

protected under the Russian constitution and the European Convention on Human

Rights ," it did not sound convincing. An estimated 866 people were arrested in

Moscow alone.

Practically half of Russians are unaware that on the 12th June they are supposed

to celebrate 'The Day of Russia' according to a recent Levada poll. If you ask Russians

what is Navalny's political stance even more ignorance arises. Most people don't know.

Even most protesters can't offer me a straight answer other than; "he is against corruption''.

The most important point is that he is not a fascist but a relatively moderate Russian

nationalist who believes that the main cause of Russia's economic ills is due to the loss

of money via corruption. The money which could be saved on corruption could be

used to regenerate the economy assuring wider prosperity. He is center right in his politics.

 

When I got out of the metro station Mayakovsky the atmosphere was claustrophobic.

You had to squeeze past a never ending line of riot police and and reconstruction sites.

All the pavements from this metro to the city center were under massive construction.

As we walked on single -file past another line of people leaving in the opposite direction

we noticed hundreds of riot police were running in formation and halting along our path.

They were mainly fresh young faces who had a kind of bemused look on their face betraying

they were raw. Many wore green helmets and bullet proof vests and resembled soldiers

so much one protester asked 'Have they brought in the army?'' We were almost surrounded

by the police. I tried to take a short cut to the square but noticed every alley or road was

either a dead end or blocked by police. While doing this I encountered Monica Spibak

whom I had interviewed during the protest against Demolition. 'I warned her :"You are

likely to get arrested . It is like walking into a trap." She answered : "If I get arrested I'll

tell you all about it." You could see many buses along the way ready for the detained.

I thought they intended to arrest everyone on the demonstration.

What followed assumed a dreamlike surreal situation which was unreal. The riot

police began to arrest people shortly after 2.p.m. But who could they arrest? Most

of the protesters were not carrying placards and some people carrying flags were

celebrating 'The Day of Russia ' . The police chose the option 'Arrest and later find out'.

One man who was being escorted to a police bus by a policeman complained ; "I just

wanted to get a cup of coffee ! " It must have been an expensive cost of coffee. He

could have been fined 10,000 rubles ! The funniest incident was when a Putin supporter

came up and was being filmed by a T.V. crew. He started to complain : " Those riot

police are not doing their job. They should be arresting protesters yet they are either

letting them go by or even letting them go..... When Putin is reelected next year we

will all be better off." Just after he said those lines two Russia riot policemen grabbed him

and took him away to the police station. This example serves to indicate that the arresting

was not so much indiscriminate but inconsistently sporadic.

Reenactment groups who were dawning Viking costumes to perform on this day claimed

"Our day was ruined by this demonstration."

Not all the opposition agrees with the decision by Navalny to change the location of the

demonstration. They thought it needlessly provocative . Critics stated that very little

thought was given on how to secure the release of those arrested. Many of the families

of those arrested also face the predicament of having to pay hefty fines from 10 to

20,000 rubles or days in detention.

A maths teacher , Dmitri Bogatov who was arrested in a previous protest has had his

detention extended until the 30th June. He faces serious charges of inciting disorder

through the internet under part 3 , article 212 of the law of the Russian Federation ' and

more ludicrously of encouraging terrorism. The protest movement should take more

steps to defend his case and rethink its tactics. The aim of most opposition movements

is to avoid arrest and not to make themselves sitting ducks for the riot police.

If the government had any sense it would not arrest anyone on this demonstration.It would

let sleeping dogs lie and there would be very few, if any unpleasant scuffles or disorder.

However, every time mass arrests are made , more and more people ,feeling indignant,

join the protests. Not all the police in Russia used heavy handed tactics against the

protests . In Omsk where 3000 gathered to protest, no one was arrested. And

in Magadan where about 100 gathered, nobody faced detention at all !

In one village in the Arkhangelskaya region , seven protesters were left alone by the police

No arrests were made. In fact, the police shook hands with the protesters to show there was no ill-feeling.

HOD Meeting

CTU HOD Meeting Ends with a Thud
By Jim Vail

CTU VP Jesse Sharkey emotional outburst at the HOD meeting last week
revealed certain budgetary problems.

The Chicago Teachers Union House of Delegates meeting last Wednesday was supposed to be focused on the budget.

Instead, the union leadership decided to begin the last meeting of the school year late so they could honor Jackie Vaughn - the hall is named after her - and pay tribute to Rep. Monique Davis -a 100 percent voting record in favor of the teachers union. 

CTU President Karen Lewis said Rep. Davis even voted against SB7 - interesting because Lewis at one point told legislators to vote in favor of SB7 which eliminated seniority rights and other bargaining items. She said they saved the right to strike, though legislators mandated teachers needed 70% to vote in favor. A push back from the membership, and resolution by the executive board against SB7 forced some changes, and confused legislators.

So the meeting on the budget started late. Many members left by the time a vote was supposed to take place. Delegate Frank McDonald asked if they have a quorum, which means are there a majority of CTU delegate in the hall to vote. 

At this point, CTU VP Jesse Sharkey erupted and shouted how could somebody call a quorum and then the union is left without a budget. It was pure sabotage to do this, he thundered. McDonald did not respond, and then Lewis asked if anyone would like to call a quorum, after Sharkey made it clear the delegates should not call a quorum. Nobody said anything.

During the debate on the budget, a few delegates had questions about the Chicago Teachers Foundation - whose budget was used to purchase the current CTU building. This was after the CTU sold the Fukes Tower for about $40 million.

Sharkey admitted had the union not used money from the foundation - not union dues - to plug a $700,000 budget deficit, then there would have been job cuts.

Another delegate asked about the union joining forces with the charters teachers union - ChiActs - and will this affect the money and time devoted to grievances and paying for lawyers for arbitration. Sharkey said field rep Joey McDermott and others devoted about $100,000 or so to help negotiate one of the charter school contracts.

Several delegates complained that the union should not cut its organizing department. According to sources, organizer Matt Luskin was moved out of the organizing department to the political department, so a vacancy was made available.

Executive board members, according to sources, argued to add another paid position to make room for another organizer. The board decided not to do this since the union has a big deficit.

At the end Sharkey yelled out that he quit. He did apologize afterwards for his outburst to delegates who said it was wrong what he did, by speaking out of turn and not addressing the delegates question about the quorum.

I believe the union leadership did not expect some good questions concerning a troubling budget.

The delegates voted in favor of the final budget.   

School Almost Out!

THE END OF RUSSIAN SCHOOL TERM!

By Stephen Wilson

 Moscow -- "Ooorah It is the end of school ! We are free ! No more homework ! We can do what we want!"

 

shout many Russian school students . You notice their beaming cheerful radiant faces looming

 

up everywhere . At least that is how the younger school students may feel. In contrast to

 

school children in Britain who can only expect around 8 weeks Summer holidays , Russian

 

children obtain 3 months off ! At least that is what it seems . In practice , you can find

 

many children are sent off to educational Summer camps or English courses abroad. Not

 

all children are entitled to a break . Worn out children can be noticed dozing off in classrooms.

 

 

How to bring up a new generation of docile school children who faithfully obey the state

 

remains a challenging issue for the government. Many children have minds of their own

 

and even question the powers to be . When some school children took to the streets in

 

protests at state corruption the government became alarmed . The speaker of the Duma,

 

Valentina warned : "Responsibility for taking part in unsanctioned meetings

 

must lie with the parents" . There was talk about drawing up new legislation carrying

 

legal reprisals for bringing up such children ' improperly. ' In other words, not bringing them

 

up to support Putin. The notion that children have a right to an opinion of their own is an

 

alien concept to Russian politicians. Children should not be seen and not be heard. They

 

should also shut up. According to the Minister of Education : "Childhood should be

 

non-political '. Children should be immersed in books and not discussing politics.

 

All those kinds of speeches actually incite children to escalate their protests. Forbidden

 

fruit often tastes better than freely granted food .

 

This year, as many as 700,000 school students graduated from school. This represented

 

less than 40,000 from the previous year indicating Russia is still plagued with a persistent

 

demographic problem. In some ways school children are more acutely perceptive of

 

what is going on that adults who are set in their ways. They can detect a lie better. It

 

is difficult to lie to children. Like the child in the Hans Christen Anderson tale , they can

 

see the Emperor is not wearing clothes. But they are not always free of illusions. 

According  to a recent Russian social survey , most Russian school students believe that after they

 

graduate from a good university they will automatically attain a job with the high pay of

 

80,000 rubles a month. Access to university is often equated with meeting a golden fish

 

who can grant every wish ! They are also attempting to enter professions which are

 

flooded with too many applicants : like as advocates, economists , and in finance. Very few of

 

them seek to enter the less prestigious and less well paid jobs in forestry , farming and

 

engineering where there exist greater shortages and needs. Yet after graduating from

 

university, 40 % of graduates in law and 20 % of economists can't find work even after

 

a year. You can find them working in low paid fast food restaurants and in bookshops !

 

Yet Russian needs more experts in fishing, farming and forestry .

 

If you stay in Moscow for a long time what you can't help noticing is how many

 

ex-journalists there are. Asked why they don't do journalism they claim it is not creative.

 

Perhaps the market is just flooded with too many journalists !

 

Maybe the government needlessly worries about controlling children. Parents already

 

strictly control them or are at least attempting to. A recent survey by Levada found that

 

32% of adults punish their children physically while 24% did this severely . As many as

 

54% of adults claim to check their children's letters, look at their own things and even

 

check their pockets for unwanted things. As many as 47% of parents admit they have the

 

right to forbid them from meeting their friends, and choosing who they can befriend.

 

The only form of freedom children are allowed is to earn money. As many as 24%

 

of parents put the money into the family budget. It is evidently not easy to be a Russian

 

school child.

Student Arrest

BOY ARRESTED FOR RECITING HAMLET

By Stephen Wilson

 

Moscow, Russia -- 'All the world's a stage' declares a character from the play of Shakespeare : 'As You Like it '. Well this is not entirely true. As this was the harsh brutal truth thrust into a boy by policemen who practically pounced on him dragging him

away without any explanation or polite inquiry . In fact , they were as tactful as

sledgehammers. What great offence had the boy committed ? He had been loudly reciting Hamlet in the Arbatskaya district of Moscow, an area notorious for attracting buskers of all sorts.

Noticing the shocked look on the boy, a woman who had been looking after him

intervened and attempted to stop the police. It never occurred to the police that

it might be more appropriate to ask the logical question : "Why are you reciting

Hamlet in the Arbatskaya ?" And this was in deed the main question which people

began to ask themselves . What is a ten year old boy doing reading poetry ? Was

he being used by parents to boost their income ? Was he a homeless boy attempting

to get by ? Or maybe he simply adored William Shakespeare !

 

The last explanation might not be so absurd. I have met many Russian school students

who love to quote Hamlet or have been asked to perform in school plays .

 

Russian affection for the poet is no secret. Boris Pasternak did great translations of his

works and a Russian Philosopher called Leon Shestov took the trouble to write a

book : 'Shakespeare and his critic Brandes. ' Shestov stated that the poet was his : "His

first master in philosophy". But that is not how the police saw Shakespeare ! Hearing

him being recited loudly evidently got on their nerves.

Although the boy was later released , the woman , Christina Skvronski has been charged

with obstructing the police from carrying out their legal duties.

When I told one of my school students of what had happened , Roman expressed disbelief:

"You are joking. How can anyone be arrested for reciting a poet? " Street musicians who

witnessed the incident see nothing wrong with the boy performing in public. In fact, the that allegations he was illegally begging do not stand up to scrutiny. Just because he

may have had an empty hat or box nearby is not suffice for him to face charges. You need

to openly ask for money to be accused of begging. The police can check or make an

investigation if they have reasonable grounds for suspicion .

 

The father of the boy ,who declines to be named, stated ;"The boy has problems with

his speech and can't pronounce several letters . So psychologists advised him to

recite poetry in public ". Whether the psychologists had reciting poetry in public in mind

is another matter.

 

This author could be arrested. I once recited a story by Chaucer in the Park of Sculpture.

However , it was done more discreetly in a garden . However , I am not ten years old. But it is strange to think that while most teachers are struggling to inspire their children with a

lively interest in Shakespeare one young boy was arrested for enthusiasm . He at least

deserves a medal!