Saturday, June 29, 2019

Film Review

 FILM REVIEW : THE TOBACCONIST  

            {Promoted in Russia as 'My Friend Sigmund Freud or Мой Друг Зигмунд
            Фрейд}

            Austria/Germany 2018 Directed by Nicholas Leytmer
            Based on the bestselling novel 'The Tobacconist' by
            Robert Seethaler

By Stephen Wilson

           "If I were you would go home young man. Here you will have nothing but
            troubles" warns an old beggar when the naive young hero arrives at
            the railway station in Vienna to take up work in a tobacco shop in the
            late 1930's. How right the wise woman is ! The impressionable ,innocent
            and inept young Franz, stumbles from one fiasco to another as he becomes
            infatuated by a charismatic dancer Aneshka, played by Emma Drugunova
            and asks advice from one of the tobacconist's customers who happens
            to be the famous father of Psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud, played by
            Bruno Ganz. But since Franz's boss happens to be an Austrian Jew,  
            against the background of the rise of the Nazis, the shop comes under
            constant harassment and assault from Nazis thugs. Poor Franz has
            just found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time. We witness
            a dramatic confrontation between the tobacconist ,{played by Johannes
            Krish} , his assistant, and the Nazis. The tobacconist, a war veteran who
            has lost his leg , fights to maintain his dignity against neighbors who envy
            his success as a businessman.

            The film 'The Tobacconist ' has a brilliant cast, the acting is superb, and
            the shooting of pre-war Vienna is  convincing and at times stunning.
            The film poignantly captures the tense atmosphere of prewar Vienna
            where people are so desperate they'll do anything to get by. The dialogue
            can also be very witty and thought provoking. Austria at this time was
            witnessing daily terrorist bombings of at times 40 a day, as well as
            attempted political coups against a background of 37% unemployment
            in 1938. Few felt safe in such volatile times.

            The basic plot of the film is that Franz is sent by his mother to work for
            the tobacconist after her lover is struck dead by lightning while swimming
            in a lake. The tobacconist is an old ex-lover. The tobacconist is a friendly,
            generous and kind man who takes Franz under his wing and shows him
            the tricks of the trade. He tells Franz "We don't just sell cigars but desires
            and wishes ".In other words, for many people a cigar is not simply a cigar
            but a symbol of status, prestige or a means to think better. When one frail
            and vulnerable customer enters the shop then leaves the tobacconist informs
            Franz "That is one of our most famous customers Sigmund Freud. You have
            no doubt heard of him. He fixes people's minds. " Since Freud has forgotten
            to take his cigars Franz runs out to hand them to him. At that moment a
            friendship is struck up . From then on Franz is constantly asking for advice
            on how to woo and win the love of a girl he adores. Freud's first piece of
            advice is " Go out and get a girl friend " to which Franz wisely answers " That
            is easier said than done". For Franz runs out of money on his first date and
            is alarmed to see his girl do a disappearing date. Franz manages to find the
            work location of the girl only to be shocked into discovering she is performing
            in some semi-pornographic cabaret. When he scolds her for this she retorts
           "We all have to make a living somehow". To make matters worse, the Nazis
            are breaking the windows of the shop, dubbing racist slogans and throwing
            dead animals into the shop. Tension amounts as to 'Will the Tobacconist and
            his assistant survive and can Franz win the girl of his dreams?'
            Freud advises Franz to keep a dream diary where he is to write down his
            dreams. The film depicts many of those dream scenes . In one scene a
            naked Freud and Franz is in a rowing boat which is sinking. Franz is trying
            to save Freud by getting rid of the water. Freud says "Don't worry about  
            me. Think about Love " .

            It is worth noting that Freud is played by the late Bruno Ganz. This must
            have been one of his last roles. He recently died of cancer this year. It is
            interesting to observe that he was playing the role of a person , Freud, who
            was also dying of cancer. Ganz was a legendary actor. He played the part
            in Wim Wender's film "Angels over Berlin" {1987} as well as Hitler in the
            film 'Downfall'. Ganz makes a great job in portraying the frail , vulnerable
            and humane side of Freud. Freud tells Franz that "Women are like cigars.
            Pull at them too hard and you lose the pleasure of them ".

            Freud did not just adore cigars but was hopelessly addicted to them. At
            times he could smoke a maximum of twenty a day. He never completely
            gave them up even after being diagnosed with cancer. He would squeeze
            a cigar into his frozen jaw by using a coat peg. Freud argued that smoking
            cigars gave him the peace of mind and concentration to write his works
            more effectively. Smoking them helped him to be more creative. A story  
            goes that when his nephew refused his offer of a cigarette Freud scolded
            him with the words " My boy, smoking is one of the greatest and cheapest
            enjoyments in life , and if you decide in advance not to smoke, I can only
            feel sorry for you . "
            Whether Ganz could ever equal Freud by emulating the frightening stare
            he shot at people is debatable. Although Freud at 81 looked very brittle
            weak and old, his eyes still remained potent. When he looked at you he
            could look through you in a terrifying way. The Nazis once plundered his
            house while he was away. They stole his money and some possessions.
            But when Freud came home and saw them he shot them an angry awesome
            look. It terrified them. They ran off in panic ! As Mark Edmundson writes
           'His eyes, as almost everyone who knew him during those days attested,
            remained potent: at times, Freud did not stare at things , so much as
            through them to the other side. Overall , his presence was unnerving :
            by 1938, deep into old age , Freud looked like a dark fairy tale version
            of Death himself '{ page 10,The Death of Sigmund Freud, Fascism,
            psychoanalysis and the Rise of Fundamentalism, Mark Edmundson,
            Bloomsbury, London, 2007} . We don't see this side of Freud in the
            film but his more caring and compassionate side. Perhaps this is just
            as well because Freud has recently received enough hostility from  
            Critics.

            The film shows a scene where Freud leaves Vienna for London at the
            train station. But most Jews in the late 1930's could not escape. Around
            the time of the Anschluss many Jews were being attacked , assaulted
            and hounded by racists. They were being forced out on to the streets
            to clean pavements with toothbrushes while people humiliated ,jeered
            and beat them. Escaping from Austria was very complex. You faced  
            endless red tape. Not only did an Austrian Jew need stamped documents
            from Austrian officials but proper visas from Foreign embassies. All this
            cost much money which was way beyond the meager income of most of
            them. When thousands of Austrian Jews boarded a train for Prague they
            were turned away from the border. Many returned to face concentration
            camps and detention. The wiser ones crossed the border illegally.
            Freud only managed to obtain refuge in England because he had many
            influential contacts such as a Princess , as well as the American government.
            But Freud's friends  could not save all his sisters.

            The film reminds us that  the attitude to fleeing refugees in the 1930's was
            not any better than at this current period of time. Many Jews perished in the
            Holocaust partly because of harsh immigration officials who refused to allow
            refugees asylum in their countries. Britain and the Republic of Ireland refused
            many applications for asylum. Not seeing any way out, many Austrian Jews
            committed suicide. In some disturbing scenes we see people throwing themselves
            off the roof.

            The Tobacconist is worth watching although it is at times a harrowing film. When
            i watched this film in a Russian cinema I noticed that the censors had dubbed out
            the swastikas on the German flags hanging out of the Austrian state buildings. The
            measure must have been taken to avoid being punished for inadvertently breaking
            strict anti-Nazis propaganda laws in Russia. Yet the film The Tobacconist is an
            explicit anti-Fascist film as well as artistic work.

Wednesday, June 26, 2019

Nazi monument here?

New NATO-approved US monument honors fascist Lithuanian Nazi collaborator as anti-Soviet hero

A new monument in Chicago celebrates US-born Lithuanian Nazi collaborator Adolfas Ramanauskas “Vanagas,” who led a fascist militia that massacred Jews in the Holocaust. EU and NATO member Lithuania heroizes him for fighting the USSR.

By Ben Norton

The Grayzone.com

The United States is now the site of a monument to a Nazi collaborator.
In the suburbs of Chicago, a Lithuanian government-backed group has erected a statue dedicated to US-born Adolfas Ramanauskas (known by the codename Vanagas), who led a fascist militia that massacred Jews in the Holocaust.
Because Ramanauskas also helped lead the fight against the Soviet Union, he has been lionized by NATO allies.
In fact, the current government of Lithuania — a proud member of both the European Union and NATO — even sent its foreign minister to bless this pro-fascist monument at its unveiling ceremony.

The academic publication Defending History, which tracks Holocaust revisionism in Eastern Europe, has documented the controversy behind the construction of the statue.
The government-sponsored Genocide and Resistance Research Centre of Lithuania initiated a campaign to build a monument to Ramanauskas in the town of his birth, New Britain, Connecticut.
Lithuania’s state-funded Genocide and Resistance Research Centre has spent the past nearly three decades fueling Holocaust revisionism by portraying Nazi-collaborating Lithuanian fascists who murdered Jews in the Holocaust as anti-communist resistance heroes, while depicting Jewish anti-fascist partisans as war criminals; and by advancing the “double genocide” theory that falsely equates Soviet atrocities with Nazi crimes against humanity.
Lithuania monument Adolfas Ramanauskas Vanagas flags
But the New Britain, Connecticut Common Council rebelled againstthe Lithuanian government’s plans to build the monument, forcing the town’s Republican mayor to cancel the construction.
This led the Lithuanian government to move the monument to the private property of the Lithuanian World Center in Lemont, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, which has a large Lithuanian-American community.
On May 4, the monument to the infamous Nazi collaborator was unveiled in a ceremony sponsored by EU and NATO member Lithuania. Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius ‏traveled to the US for the event, and honored Ramanauskas as a “freedom fighter.”
Th Russian government pushed back, declaring in response to Linkevicius on Twitter, “Adolfas Ramanauskas (Vanagas) – Nazi collaborator & criminal actively involved durind WWII and afterwards in extermination of Jewish population of Lithuania, participated in massacres of Poles, Lithuanians, Russians, Belorussians & other ethnic groups. Glorifying him is shameful

The Lithuanian foreign ministry replied with an impassioned defense of the Nazi-collaborating anti-Soviet partisan leader.
A few days after tweeting in support of these Nazi collaborators who led fascist militias that murdered Jews in the Holocaust, Lithuania’s Foreign Ministry and foreign minister published tweets praising Israel.

Government honors for Nazi collaborators

A staggering 90 to 96 percent of Jews in Lithuania were killed in the Holocaust. Support for fascism and the Nazi occupation was not uncommon in the deeply right-wing, anti-Semitic, and anti-communist country.
Adolfas Ramanauskas’ role in this genocidal onslaught is well documented. Lithuanian scholar Evaldas Balciunas noted that, in his own memoirs, Ramanauskas “boasts that he served as leader of ‘the rebels’ squad’ during the precise days and weeks of June and July 1941 when these ‘rebels’ of the Lithuanian Activist Front (LAF) were in fact unleashing humiliation, plunder, violence and indeed murder against Jewish neighbors (the Soviet army was escaping Hitler’s invasion, not these white-armbanded LAFers).”
Many Lithuanian anti-Soviet partisans took the following oath, as documented by Balciunas:
“I pledge to battle the Bolshevik soldiers in hiding as well as other Bolshevik supporters, Communists, Communist Youth, Pioneers, and all pillagers and enemies of the public order with all my strength and no fear for my own life…
Long live Lithuania, long live our liberator Germany and its leader Adolf Hitler.”
Since the overthrow of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1990 and the collapse of the USSR, the increasingly right-wing government in Vilnius has moved to rehabilitate past Nazi collaborators like Ramanauskas.
Lithuania’s parliament the Seimas designated 2018 to be the year of Adolfas Ramanauskas “Vanagas.” The Lithuanian government held a ceremony to commemorate Ramanauskas’ 100th birthday. The Lithuanian Armed Forces marched in honor of the Nazi collaborator, after a flag ritual in front of the parliament building in the capital Vilnius.
In October 2018, the Lithuanian government held a massive two-day state funeral ceremony for Ramanauskas, also featuring the military and top figures from the Catholic Church, including the archbishop of Vilnius. Ramanauskas had been captured by the KGB and killed in 1957, but Lithuania’s post-Soviet right-wing government posthumously honored him with this state funeral, along with a symbolic promotion to brigadier general and the Order of the Cross.
Lithuanian media reports on these state-sponsored ceremonies referred to the fascist leader of an anti-Semitic militia as an “anti-Soviet resistance commander” and “prominent leader of the Lithuanian Freedom Fighters.”

NATO’s praise for Baltic Nazi collaborators

This is not the first time NATO allies have honored Nazi collaborators from the Baltic states. The Grayzone reported in July 2017 on a flashy film produced by NATO that honored the Forest Brothers, Baltic pro-fascist fighters who voluntarily collaborated with the Nazis before later fighting the Soviet Union.
 The Lithuanian government has returned the favor, flaunting pride for its membership in NATO, and the EU.
On their official Facebook and Twitter accounts, the Foreign Ministry and Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius have header images boasting of Lithuania’s “15 years in the European Union and NATO.”
Lithuania foreign ministry EU NATO
Before being promoted to foreign minister in 2012, Linkevicius served for six years as Lithuania’s permanent representative to NATO. He has fawned over NATO, repeatedly calling it the “greatest political-military Alliance in history.”
Ben Norton is a journalist and writer. He is a reporter for The Grayzone, and the producer of the Moderate Rebelspodcast, which he co-hosts with Max Blumenthal. His website is BenNorton.com, and he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.

Monday, June 17, 2019

Teacher Attacks


INSULTING RUSSIAN TEACHERS - BEING BOORISH IS ABOVE THE LAW
By Stephen Wilson


"School teachers are losers afflicted with their own complexes who are not
in a condition to develop themselves. In general, they are not capable of
being transformed or changed ... Of course, each school has its star teacher
which amounts to one out of five teachers. The rest of the teachers are a
grey mass ... A person must master a profession, be it a historian,
mathematician, physicist or foreign language teacher, then afterwards he or
she should learn the modern methodology of teaching and the psychology
of teaching children," declared Ivan Fedotov in a speech to the International
Forum at Saint Petersburg. Fedotov is a rector of a University of Economics.

This boorish speech which echoes the blatant contempt of the Prime-Minister
Medvedev who suggested low-paid teachers should go out and start a small
business if they are unsatisfied with their pay, aroused an angry response
from many teachers. He was described as 'out of touch', 'an uncultured
buffoon' and 'hypocrite'. "Let him do a job as a school teacher". "He should
be fired " for this insult. One teacher, Tamara stated: "We teachers do a
thankless job. We have mountains of paperwork, stress and work with difficult
children. This so-called expert needs to offer a public apology".

Like many rectors, Fedotov earns about 20 times the salary of an average
school teacher or lecturer. According to a declaration of income in 2013,
his pay amounted to a staggering 9,319,395 rubles a year and he owns
a Harley Davidson Xl 1200 as well as a collection of expensive cars.
Compare this salary to a teacher who at most obtains about 70 or 80
thousand rubles a month in Moscow.

Fedotov, who is supposed to be an academic, never clarifies or defines
what he regards as 'a successful teacher' as opposed to 'a loser'. Is
a teacher a loser because he has a low salary, fails to get his students
through exams or upgrades his skills? It is not entirely clear so Fedotov
comes across as just another angry and ill-tempered official who has woken
up with a hang over. But if he took himself the trouble to be acquainted with
some recent research he would find that Russian English school teachers
did a great job in successfully preparing students for the Unitary State
exam. Instead of teachers being applauded for this, the Minister of Education
stated: "We have to make the English exam harder ". It was as if the English
exam was not difficult enough! Some International research indicated that
Russian school teachers are the most qualified and educated teachers in
Europe. They enthusiastically seek to upgrade and perfect their skills. Many
teachers often don't have the time or the resources to improve their skills. Yet
what amazes the outsider most is how Russian school teachers manage to
accomplish so much despite so many trying obstacles.

What is unfair are the double standards! If a teacher described a politician or
official in the same language as this rector he could be liable to a heavy
fine and imprisonment. For example, if you called Putin 'a thief' or 'a loser'
you could be fined 300,000 rubles for insulting a public official. A recently
passed law renders it illegal to express 'disrespect' of an official or politician.
It is okay for an official to insult teachers, but quite another for teachers to
insult an official. An attempt to make it illegal for a politician or official to
insult the public was of course rejected by the Duma. But what would one
expect from politicians?

So much for freedom of speech or academic freedom. An academic is obliged
to at least clearly define what he exactly means and at least offer evidence
to support his arguments. I don't see any of this in Fedotov's speech. It just
seems yet another inarticulate anti-teacher rant. At least school teachers go
beyond the academic. Fedotov falls below the academic. He is just way below
the belt.

One of the best ways you could attempt to improve educational standards at
schools and in institutions would be for teach people to be polite. What makes
a great school teacher is not just qualifications, practical skills and knowledge
but being polite to your students in the deepest sense. Politeness at the highest
level implies loving respect. A good teacher loves his or her students. Now if a
teacher doesn't love other teachers, you can hardly be astonished if they don't
also love their own pupils.