Why Are Children Forced to Take an Unproven Test?
By Jim Vail
Special to MyChiNews.com
A post I shared on Facebook said it best, “Why
are we supposed to differentiate our instruction for children and then give
them standardized tests?”
And give them the new Common Core standardized
tests that most children failed in Illinois and throughout the country last
year.
A growing number of parents and students who want
to opt out of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and
Careers or PARCC test led to a bill that passed the Illinois House last year
that would give parents a formal way to opt out of such standardized tests.
Some schools in Chicago led fights to opt
students out of the tests despite threats from CPS.
A large number of parents in New York forced
the education reform Governor Andrew Cuomo to push back the Common Core tests
after more research is done.
According to Valerie Strauss in The Washington
Post, more than 100 education researchers in California have called for an end
to high-stakes testing, saying there is no “compelling” evidence that the Common
Core State Standards will improve the quality of education or close the
achievement gap, and that the tests lack “validity, reliability and fairness.”
“The California Alliance of Researchers for
Equity in Education, a statewide collaborative of university-based
education researchers, recently released a research brief describing concerns
with the Common Core standards and the assessments being given to millions of
students in California and other states around the country this spring,” Strauss
wrote in her March 16 article entitled, “Education
researchers blast Common Core standards, urge ban on high-stakes tests.”
According to Strauss, researchers from
universities like Stanford and UCLA say the Common Core high-stakes tests,
pushed by billionaires like Bill Gates and Eli Broad, actually harm students.
“Although proponents argue that the CCSS promotes
critical thinking skills and student-centered learning (instead of rote
learning), research demonstrates that imposed standards, when linked with
high-stakes testing, not only deprofessionalizes teaching and narrows the
curriculum, but in so doing, also reduces the quality of education and
student learning, engagement, and success. The impact is also on student
psychological well-being: Without an understanding that the scores have not
been proven to be valid or fair for determining proficiency or college
readiness, students and their parents are likely to internalize failing labels
with corresponding beliefs about academic potential.”
The Chicago Teachers Union has been calling
for less onerous testing and passed a resolution to abolish the Common Core
tests. The union said that such unproven tests are used to close schools and
fire teachers rather than pinpoint areas of academic weakness that need
improvement.
The report out of California noted that these
standardized tests would hurt graduation rates. A tentative contract agreement
between the CTU and the Chicago Public Schools, which has not been agreed on
yet, stated schools could only be closed if graduation rates fall.
The students who get hit even harder are the “low
achieving students, minority students, and female students,” the report stated.
The Obama administration has pushed the Common
Core with Race to the Top, using federal tax dollars to implement these
standards. However, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump echoed many
conservatives by stating he would abolish the Common Core and give states the
final say on education.
Many said that the Common Core standards,
while endorsed by the governors association, were written and pushed by
conservative think tanks with little input from teachers.
It is truly amazing the number of tests
children have to take today. I spoke to a bi-lingual teacher in the city who
said his third-grade students take the NWEA MAP test three times a year, the
Teaching for Reading Comprehension test three times a year, the ACCESS
bi-lingual test which can take up to a month, and now the PARCC test, which
schools will start administering in the upcoming weeks.
While the PARCC administrators decided to cut
the test by 90 minutes, it is still a week’s worth of testing.
How much instructional time is lost to
testing?
The Post article further cited concerns that
the new assessments “lack basic principals of sound science, such as construct
validity, research-based cut scores, computer adaptability, inter-rater
reliability, and most basic of all, independent verification of validity.”
The majority of students who took the tests last
year failed (low proficient), and predicted a 90% failure rate for English
Language Learners (who make up 22% of CA public schools) in California, the
research stated.
“The tests have not provided adequate accommodations
for students with disabilities and English-language learners.”
The other concerns include the cost of the
test. While cutting back on school budgets to fund more teachers and
instructional materials, the costs for implementing the Common Core tests are
high. In addition to signing contracts with testing companies like Pearson, the
computer-based assessment costs are also high for schools, including upgrading
equipment, bandwidth and technical support.
Illinois had earlier signed a four-year $160
million contract to administer the PARCC exam.
“In practical terms, this means that
standardized testing has taken precedence over other priorities such as class-size
reduction, quality teacher training and retention, programs in the arts,
adequate science and technology equipment, and keeping neighborhood schools
open,” the report stated.
No comments:
Post a Comment