CHEKHOV: HIS
LAMENT FOR POOR TEACHERS
By Stephen Wilson
Please don't whistle,
Masha. How can you ? {pause.} It is being at school all
day and then teaching
in the evenings that gives me those constant headaches
and makes me feel like
an old woman. And these four years that I have been
teaching at the school
I really have felt my youth and strength draining out of
me, drop by drop .And
my one dream growing stronger all the time ' laments the
school teacher Olga in
Chekhov's play 'The Three Sisters'. And in another play,
The Seagull, the
schoolmaster Semyon Medvedenko states, 'I have a much
harder life than you.
I earn a miserable twenty-three rubles a month before
superannuation is deducted.' In many of Chekhov's plays and some short
stories, Chekhov
depicts the life of Russian teachers before the revolution as
one of not only
relentless poverty, misery, and ill health, but a largely thankless
job where he is
constantly anxious about losing his job. He has no job security and
can be dismissed on a
whim. Despite some misleading impressions that
Chekhov's plays
expressed a sentimental yearning for a golden rural way of
life, his works are a
subtle satire on the constant boredom, meaningless and
lack of purpose which
ran through the villages even among the Gentry.
I asked a teacher if
there was a patron saint of teachers that they appealed to .
In an instant, my
colleague conjured up an icon from her bag and thrust it on me
saying that Saint
Sergei of Radonezhki is their saint. He defends teachers. But
why not also Chekhov?
If anyone deserves to qualify as a patron saint of teachers
it ought to be
Chekhov. Chekhov was a passionate and ardent advocate of better
conditions for the
Russian school teacher. He thought that the way teachers were
treated in Russia was
a sheer disgrace. One only needs to quote a memoir of Maxim
Gorky when he listened
to Chekhov ranting on about the plight of teachers and even
kindly listening to
one who visited him. Chekhov told Gorky:
"If I had lots of
money I would build a sanatorium here for sick village teachers. A
building full of
light, you know, very light, with big windows and high ceilings. I'd
have a splendid
library, all sorts of musical instruments, an apiary, a vegetable
garden, an orchard.
I'd have lectures on agronomy, meteorology, and so on .
Teachers ought to know
everything, old man, everything . If you only knew the
absolute necessity for
the Russian countryside of good, clever , educated teachers.
In Russia we have
simply got to create exceptional conditions for teachers, and
that as soon as
possible, since we realize that unless the people get an all-round
education the state
will collapse like a house built from insufficiently baked bricks.'
He further adds that
"Our teachers are navies , half educated individuals who go
to the village to
teach children as willingly as they would go into exile.They are
famished, down
trodden, they live in perpetual fear of losing their livelihood......
It is absurd to pay a
niggardly pittance to one who is called upon to educate the
people. It is
intolerable that such a one should go about in rags, shiver in a damp,
dilapidated school, be
poisoned by fumes from badly ventilated stoves and by the
age of thirty be a
mass of disease, laryngitis, rheumatism , tuberculosis. It is a
disgrace to us!
For nine or ten months in the year our teachers live the lives of
hermits, without a
soul to speak to, they grow stupid, from loneliness, without
books or
amusements......... All this is quite disgusting... a kind of mockery of
human beings doing a
great and terribly important work. I tell you, when I meet
a teacher I feel quite
awkward in front of him - for his timidity, and for his shabbiness.
I feel as if I myself were
somehow to blame for the teacher's wretched state - I do
really."
It is striking to
compare the acute empathy and humility of Chekhov to how many
present day Russian
officials, parents, and the wider public view see teachers. In
a word, there is no
comparison. Somethings never change. The poverty of many
rural teachers is met
with much contempt. Despite the rash claim that the prestige
of school teachers has
increased due to salary increase to 105,000 rubles a month,
in Moscow, the
conditions of rural teachers still remain abysmal. Just like in
Chekhov's time, they
have no real job security and constantly worry about losing
their posts. They also
tend to be so overworked they need someone like Chekhov
to build them a
sanatorium.
Chekhov did not just
lament but lived out his words. He never quite gave up his
job as a doctor.
Despite suffering from illness , Chekhov decided to embark on
a special tour to
Sakhalin where he would investigate the conditions of Russian
prisoners, and write
a report to draw attention to the urgent need for reform. On
the island, Chekhov
interviewed thousands of prisoners working 18 hours a day.
The result was his
great work 'The Island of Sakhalin', !893-4.' It has been argued
that Chekhov's
powerful and moving description of corporal punishment in prisons
played a part in the
abolition of it for female prisoners in 1897 and then male ones
in 1904. Chekhov's
motives for his mission were clear. He wrote with a note of
sarcasm that: "From the books I have read, it is clear that we have allowed
millions of people to
rot in prisons, to rot for no purpose, without any care, and
in a barbarous way.
All of us are guilty, but none of this has anything to do with
us, it is not just
interesting." But the plight of the rural teacher and prisoner was
of keen interest to
Chekhov. And Chekhov deserves our gratitude!
No comments:
Post a Comment